What's new

How to Find Your 3–5 Winning Strategies Fast

David

Founder & CEO @ Galileo FX
Staff member
  1. Start in demo. Don’t be a hero. Nobody wins by risking real money on day one. Demo is free practice, so use it.
  2. Hit the Performance Page https://performance.galileofx.com. Scroll around, grab 10 strategies you vibe with. Pick based on your style and the assets you actually like.
  3. Load ’em up in Galileo FX. Run all 10 in your demo account. Yes, all at once. Let the bot do the heavy lifting.
  4. Sit on your hands. Seriously. Do not touch a thing until each strategy has at least 30 trades, ideally 50. That’s when the numbers mean something.
  5. Cut the duds. Out of 10, a few will flop. No problem. Kill them off. You’ll still have 3, 4, maybe 5 solid winners. Replace the losers with 5 new ones.
  6. Double down on the winners. Keep them running in demo without messing with them. Once you’re comfortable, take those winners live with a small sum. Then grow slowly.
  7. Rinse and repeat. After a couple weeks, you’ll know exactly which strategies are making you money. This is the system the winners use. Nothing fancy. Just discipline.
  8. Optimization. If a strategy stops pulling its weight, don’t force it. Shut it down and toss it back into demo. Reload it on three charts, tweak the consecutive signals setting just a bit and let it prove itself again. You can adjust other settings too, but the more you change, the less consistent your results will be.
So yeah… that’s the play. Test. Filter. Double down. Scale. Keep it simple and you’ll save yourself a ton of stress.

The opposite approach is what many beginners fall into:
  • Jumping straight into live trading with money on the line
  • Picking one or two random strategies without testing them properly
  • Quitting after just a handful of losing trades
  • Constantly tweaking settings mid-test instead of letting the data build
  • Chasing “the perfect setup” instead of building consistency

Why it fails:
  1. No statistical base
    With only a few trades, results are random. A couple of bad trades can make a good strategy look broken, or a few lucky wins can fool you into thinking you found gold. Either way, you are making decisions on noise, not data.
  2. Emotional rollercoaster
    When money is live and results swing up and down with no system in place, emotions take over. Frustration, anger, and self-doubt kick in. Instead of learning, you burn out.
  3. Constant tinkering
    Changing settings mid-test destroys any chance of knowing what works. You never give a strategy enough time to show its true performance, so you’re always stuck starting over.
  4. Demoralization
    The cycle of hype, quick losses, and abandonment drains energy. It feels like the bot is failing, when really it’s the process that’s broken.
  5. Anger and blame
    Without a clear method, losses feel personal. Traders get angry at the bot, the market, or themselves. That mindset kills confidence and makes quitting feel easier than fixing the approach.

The opposite of disciplined testing is chaos. It’s a recipe for wasted money, wasted time, and the kind of frustration that makes people walk away right before they could have built something real.

🤓FOR THE NERDS (TECHNICAL EXPLANATION):
This approach works because it turns randomness into reliable data. One or two trades prove nothing, but 30 to 50 trades reveal whether a strategy has a real edge. The law of large numbers smooths out lucky wins and unlucky losses, giving you a true picture of performance. By starting with 10 strategies, you diversify and improve your odds of finding 3 to 5 consistent winners. Cutting the losers and replacing them keeps the process fresh and adaptive. Running them untouched in demo avoids bias and overfitting. Moving winners to live trading with small capital and scaling slowly makes growth safe and controlled. It’s logical, statistical and disciplined. The exact opposite of guessing.
 
Last edited:
So I have a question about the "sitting on your hands" part of the strategy. I currently have 13 strategies running simultaneously, but only one of them is making trades; EURUSD. I have been running the bot since the 11th, and it has made a total of 12 trades; 1 win and 11 losses. I have seen it happen multiple times where a position will open and at some point go positive, but not reach TP, only to reverse and get stomped out at the SL. So my question is, should I sit on my hands and let the bot run, closely monitor my trades and close positions as I see fit, or tinker with the consecutive signals?
 
So I have a question about the "sitting on your hands" part of the strategy. I currently have 13 strategies running simultaneously, but only one of them is making trades; EURUSD. I have been running the bot since the 11th, and it has made a total of 12 trades; 1 win and 11 losses. I have seen it happen multiple times where a position will open and at some point go positive, but not reach TP, only to reverse and get stomped out at the SL. So my question is, should I sit on my hands and let the bot run, closely monitor my trades and close positions as I see fit, or tinker with the consecutive signals?

In this case, what we've seen working is the following. Keep in mind that this is not financial advice, and it's based on what we've seen working in over 4 years of people using the bot including us.

1. Find out why some strategies are not placing trades. Make sure they are correctly set up, in case of doubt, contact our support for a quick check. Another reason could be that the timeframes are too long, or the strategies are conservative, so meant to filter as many trades as possible. You could try in a simulated demo environment some more aggressive strategies to see if you prefer that style of trading. It all depends on the person. Some people prefer fewer trades with a higher degree of potential profit, and others prefer to trade more aggressively and place more frequent trades and closely monitor them.

2. What we've seen working is to lower the TP so that trades are closed once it's hit. As always, try in demo mode first, and see if it solves the problem.

Thank you for your thoughtful questions, I look forward to know how it goes.
 
Back
Top